RegisteredTraveler
"Got no Privacy, Got no Liberty; 'Cause the 20th Century people took it all away from me." from "20th Century Man", The Kinks
Wednesday, August 31, 2011
what?!
From the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, in the Federal Register Today:
The amendment to § 61.71(c) would
not only provide the legal basis for
expansion of the FAA–TCCA BASA/
IPL, but would also allow similar
BASA/IPL arrangements with other
ICAO Contracting States, as determined
by the Administrator in the interest of
safety. Therefore, the FAA revises
§ 61.71 to allow holders of foreign pilot
licenses to convert to U.S. pilot
certificates where the U.S. Government
and the foreign government have
concluded a BASA and associated IPL.
See the Whole Enchilada.
DOT 115-11
Tuesday, August 30, 2011
Contact: Bill Adams
Tel.: (202) 366-4570
DOT Fines JetBlue for Violating Price Advertising Rules
The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) today fined JetBlue Airways $50,000 for violating federal aviation laws and the Department’s rules prohibiting deceptive price advertising in air travel.
“When passengers shop for an airline ticket, they have a right to know the full price they will have to pay,” said U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. “We expect airlines to treat their passengers fairly and will take enforcement action when our rules are violated.”
The Department’s Aviation Enforcement Office found that for a period of time in early 2011, JetBlue displayed fare advertisements on several websites that did not provide any information on additional taxes and fees. Consumers clicking on the advertisements were taken to a page where a list of routes and prices were displayed, along with a statement that taxes and fees would be added to the fare. However, the statement was not a link, and consumers had to scroll to the bottom of the page or click a link next to each of the listed fares to see, listed in fine print, the amount of the additional taxes and fees they would have to pay.
JetBlue’s website violated DOT rules requiring any advertising that includes a price for air transportation to state the full price to be paid by the consumer, including all carrier-imposed surcharges. The only exception currently allowed is government-imposed taxes and fees that are assessed on a per-passenger basis, such as passenger facility charges, which may be stated separately from the advertised fare but must be clearly disclosed in the advertisement so that passengers can easily determine the full price they must pay. Internet fare listings may disclose these separate taxes and fees through a prominent link next to the fare stating that government taxes and fees are extra, and the link must take the viewer directly to information where the type and amount of taxes and fees are displayed.
Under DOT’s recently adopted consumer rule that enhances protections for air travelers, carriers will be required, among other things, to include all government taxes and fees in every advertised fare beginning Jan. 24, 2012.
The consent order it available on the Internet at
Regulations.
Use docket # DOT-OST-2011-0003, as a search term.
DOT 114-11
Tuesday, August 30, 2011
Contact: Bill Mosley
Tel.: (202) 366-4570
Emirates Fined for Improperly Limiting Reimbursements for Delayed Baggage
The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) today fined the Dubai-based airline Emirates $100,000 for limiting compensation for lost, damaged, and delayed baggage to less than consumers were entitled under an international treaty.
“All air passengers, regardless of whether they are taking domestic or international flights, deserve to be compensated fairly for lost, damaged or delayed baggage,” U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said. “We will continue to take enforcement action when necessary to protect airline consumers.”
Under the Montreal Convention, an international agreement that sets liability limits for international air transportation, airlines are liable for damages caused by lost, delayed or damaged baggage up to a limit that is the equivalent of approximately $1,820 in U.S. currency unless the carrier has taken all reasonable measures to prevent the damage or it was impossible to take these measures. The Convention forbids carriers from setting a lower baggage compensation limit for international flights, and does not allow carriers to refuse to provide compensation for jewelry, electronics or other specific types of items. U.S. aviation statutes require airlines to comply with the Convention.
Based on a consumer complaint received by DOT, the Department’s Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings investigated Emirates’ handling of baggage claims for flights to or from the United States and found numerous violations of the Montreal Convention. In many cases, Emirates denied reimbursement for expensive items such as lost electronics, jewelry, and cameras. In its written responses to passengers, Emirates stated that its contract of carriage limited its liability for such items and incorrectly claimed that its practice complied with the Convention. Emirates’ website also stated that the carrier was not liable for valuables damaged while in the carrier’s custody. In addition, the carrier often provided limited or no compensation for costs related to delayed baggage while claiming in responses to passengers that limiting compensation was allowed by the Convention.
The consent order is available on the Internet at
Here.; use docket # DOT-OST-2011-0003as a search term.
Tuesday, August 30, 2011
Monday, August 29, 2011
Saturday, August 27, 2011
Bit Coin
The New Gold, plus, it is apparently untraceable. Now, that's what I call a bribe.
From the Federation of American Scientists. (shipment of enriched uranium)
Tracking Bribes.
Tuesday, August 23, 2011
Monday, August 22, 2011
New Flight Delay Rules
For Foreign Flights. . .this baby's got teeth.
To file a complaint on line.
To File A Complaint Against European Carrier.
DOT 111-11
Tuesday, August 23, 2011
Contact: Bill Mosley
Tel.: (202) 366-4570
U.S. Department of Transportation’s Expanded Airline Passenger Protections Take Effect
WASHINGTON – New consumer protections for airline passengers established by the U.S. Department of Transportation go into effect today, and will make flying more convenient and hassle-free for air travelers nationwide. The new consumer protections, finalized earlier this year, include requirements that airlines refund baggage fees if bags are lost, increase compensation provided to passengers bumped from oversold flights, and provide passengers greater protections from lengthy tarmac delays.
“The Obama Administration believes consumers have the right to be treated fairly when they fly,” U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said. “The Department of Transportation's new passenger protections will help ensure that air travelers receive the respect they deserve before, during and after their flight.”
Effective today, airlines will be required to refund any fee for carrying a bag if the bag is lost. Airlines are already required to compensate passengers for reasonable expenses for loss, damage or delay in the carriage of passenger baggage. Under the new rules, airlines must now prominently disclose all optional fees on their websites, including but not limited to fees for baggage, meals, canceling or changing reservations, or advanced or upgraded seating.
The new rules also double the amount of money passengers are eligible to be compensated for in the event they are involuntarily bumped from an oversold flight. Previously, bumped passengers were entitled to cash compensation equal to the one-way value of their tickets, up to $400, if the airline was able to get them to their destination within a short period of time (within 1 to 2 hours of their originally scheduled arrival time for domestic flights and 1 to 4 hours for international flights). If they were delayed for a lengthy period of time (more than two hours after their originally scheduled arrival time for domestic flights and 4 hours for international flights), they were entitled to double the one-way price of their tickets, up to $800. Under the new rule, bumped passengers subject to short delays will receive compensation equal to double the one-way price of their tickets, up to $650, while those subject to longer delays would receive payments of four times the one-way value of their tickets, up to $1,300. Inflation adjustments will be made to those compensation limits every two years.
The Department of Transportation’s new rule also expands the existing ban on lengthy tarmac delays to cover the international flights of foreign airlines at U.S. airports, and establishes a hard four-hour time limit on tarmac delays for all international flights at U.S. airports. It also extends the three-hour tarmac delay limit for domestic flights, currently in place only at large-hub and medium-hub airports, to flights at small-hub and non-hub airports as well. All carriers subject to the tarmac rule will be required to report lengthy tarmac delays to DOT. In all cases, exceptions to the time limits are allowed only for safety, security or air traffic control-related reasons. Carriers must also ensure that passengers stuck on the tarmac are provided adequate food and water after two hours, as well as working lavatories and any necessary medical treatment.
Additional measures under the new rule will take effect January 24, 2012, including:
•· Requiring all taxes and fees to be included in advertised fares.
•· Banning post-purchase price increases.
•· Allowing passengers to hold a reservation without payment, or to cancel it without penalty, for 24 hours after the reservation is made, if the reservation is made one week or more prior to a flight’s departure date.
•· Requiring disclosure of baggage fees when passengers book a flight.
•· Requiring that the same baggage allowances and fees apply throughout a passenger’s journey.
•· Requiring disclosure of baggage fee information on e-ticket confirmations.
•· Requiring prompt notification of delays of over 30 minutes, as well as cancellations and diversions.
The final rule, proposed rule and comments are available on the Internet at
Regulations.
Use docket # "DOT-OST-2010-0140", as a search term.
Saturday, August 20, 2011
Friday, August 19, 2011
Foreign Students Work Visas
Work and work faster. No opportunities for "cultural exchange".
Visa Program called a Fraud, via CourtHouseNews.
New Immigration Policy on Deportation!
Update: as of September 1st, 2011:
California Dreamin.
Update: from August 26th, 2011, the NYTimes:
Federal Hearings Draw Anger.
Update as of Thursday, August 25th, 2011:
Deportation Policy Spares Some, Via NPR.
Update:as of Wednesday, August 24th, 2011:
E-Verify and Alabama.
UPDATE:
An Alabama Judge says "not so fast".
New, from NPR.
Start-Ups.(from NPR)
Update to follow: as of Friday, August 19th, 2011:
Reason Enough to Re-elect him:We must get people registered to vote and we must turn out enmass to re-elect Obama now.
By the way, thanks to all who helped to circulate this story (below) which we believe was instrumental in the development of this revised policy (above):
Back story which originally appeared here on the 5th of July, 2011:
And the home of the . . .BRAVE. . . .Not so much, anymore.
I'm going to ask readers of this blog to do something today, for themselves and for their country and for the men and women who serve so bravely in the wars we are conducting abroad. I'm going to ask you to pass this story along to everyone you know and love and who might be able to bring their own influence to bear upon a deeply regretable episode in our nation's history. We are better than this.
I'm also going to ask you to get in touch with this Immigration lawyer,
Ira J. Kurzban.
To see if there is anything we can do to liberate this young man.
I happen to know a few 8 year olds and I can tell you, they take my word for everything, and it would not occur to them to do otherwise. And I believe this young man's story. And I am filled with shame. Shame for what we do, to those who come when called.
This past weekend, the NYTimes Sunday Magazine carried the story of Jose Antonio Vargas, an illegal immigrant from the Phillipines (and Pultizer Prize Winner while at the Washington Post) who has outed himself as chasing the American Dream without the requisite paperwork. In case you missed it in print, See it here.
Update:
US Drops Deportation Proceedings against Same Sex Marrigage Immigrant.
Now, how about extending that to men and women who have served this country in a time of war? Both are the right things to do. And while you're at it: How about abandoning this idea that you can take a kid away from the only family he's ever known and send him away? How do you think that would feel to a kid? Think he might internalize the trauma and think he's done something bad? Maybe think it's his fault? You can require them to undo this Neanderthal Policy, I know you can.Change always starts with US. If we don't lay down for it, they can't make it stick. Send an email to your Senator, tell him to vote FOR the Dream Act, or he'll be looking for another job. Here's the link:
US Senate.(there's a link in the upper right corner where you can select your state).
Also this weekend: Ray Henry and Kate Brumback of the Associated Press detail the role of incentives in back breaking crop picking labor, in case you missed it in print, see it here: Georgia program tries to replace migrant workers with ex-convicts.
The DREAM Act.
"Why do you love these guys so much?"
"Because. . .they stand on a wall and say. . .Nothing's gonna hurt you tonight."
Demi More in A Few Good Men. by Aaron Sorkin
Thursday, August 18, 2011
Wednesday, August 17, 2011
Tuesday, August 16, 2011
Monday, August 15, 2011
Thursday, August 11, 2011
Wednesday, August 10, 2011
June On Time Numbers
The Bureau of Transportation Statistics today released June airline on-time numbers.
Here is a summary of tables posted on the BTS website:
Tuesday, August 9, 2011
Contact: Dave Smallen
Tel.: (202) 366-5568
david.smallen@dot.gov
BTS airport rankings on flight delays and other summary tables can be found here.
The Air Travel Consumer Report released today by the U.S. Department of Transportation can be found here.
Tarmac Times can be found here.
The tables posted on the BTS website are:
Table 1: On-time arrival performance during the first six months of 2011 was the ninth highest for the January-June period in the 17 years with comparable numbers and the lowest since 2008. Note that the number of reporting carriers has varied.
Table 2: June was the 114th highest month of the 198 months with comparable records with on-time performance of 76.92 percent. On-time performance in June 2011 was the third highest for June in the last 17 years and above the average of 73.94 for June in the past 16 years.
Table 3: Salt Lake City (86.85) had the highest and Newark (63.66) had the lowest on-time arrival performance of the 29 busiest airports in June.
Table 4: Salt Lake City (83.20) had the highest and Newark (65.05) had the lowest on-time arrival performance of the 29 busiest airports for the six-month January-June period.
Table 5: Salt Lake City (88.71) had the highest and Chicago O’Hare (69.26) had the lowest on-time departure performance of the 29 busiest airports in June.
Table 6: Seattle (86.25) had the highest and Chicago Midway (68.21) had the lowest on-time departure performance of the 29 busiest airports for the six-month January-June period.
Tarmac Times: There were 14 tarmac times of more than three hours in June: six cancellations, five multiple gate departures (flight left the gate, then returned and then left again to resume normal operation), two diversions and one taxi-in (wheels-on to gate arrival). The June flight with the longest tarmac time was American Eagle Flight 4503 from New York JFK to St. Louis on June 25 which was on the St. Louis tarmac for 238 minutes before arriving at the gate, the longest tarmac time since the DOT rule went into effect.
Longest 2011 Tarmac Time: American Eagle Flight 4503 from New York JFK to St. Louis on June 25 which was on the St. Louis tarmac for 238 minutes before arriving at the gate.
Chronically Delayed: The most delayed flight in June was Continental Flight 1520 from Boston to San Francisco, which was not on time 76.92 percent of the time, averaging 102 minutes late.
For the Tables, see.
For Causes of Delay see.
For tarmac times, see.
For chonically delayed flights, look here.
BTS News Release
MEDIA ADVISORY
BTS Releases June Airline Fuel Cost and Consumption Data
The Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), a part of the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Research and Innovative Technology Administration (RITA), today updated its Airline Fuel Cost and Consumption web page with preliminary June data.
Cost per gallon for U.S. airlines’ scheduled services:
June 2010 $2.21
May 2011 $3.03
June 2011 $2.91
The page provides scheduled service cost and consumption numbers. Use the “Select a Service” dropdown to see all services or non-scheduled.
The Fuel Cost and Consumption page.
: Summaries by month are also available.
Preliminary fuel cost and consumption numbers are industry summaries only. Airline fuel costs may be affected by hedging. The next web update is scheduled for Sept. 13.
Individual airline numbers are available through December on the BTS website. Individual airline numbers for January, February and March will be available with the BTS first-quarter financial release with release date to be determined. Individual airline numbers for April, May and June will be available with the BTS second-quarter financial release scheduled for Sept 19.
DOT news release
FAA News
August 10, 2011
Contact: Lynn Lunsford
Phone: (817) 222-4455
FAA Proposes $155,000 in Civil Penalties Against American Eagle Airlines
FORT WORTH, Texas – The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is proposing $155,000 in civil penalties against American Eagle Airlines of Fort Worth, Texas for allegedly operating eight flights with incorrect weight and balance data, and for using improper maintenance procedures when repairing a jet engine and then operating the aircraft when it was not in compliance with FAA regulations.
FAA inspectors observed 12 American Eagle flights arriving at Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport, Dec. 28-29, 2010. In eight instances, loading documents for checked luggage did not match observations made by the inspector.
American Eagle’s FAA-approved weight and balance program calls for the use of an automated Electronic Weight and Balance System (EWBS) to make sure aircraft are operated with correct weight and balance information. However, accurate data must be entered for the EWBS to function properly.
Operators may not exceed an aircraft’s weight limit when loading the plane and the weight must be distributed so that the aircraft remains in balance during the flight. The FAA alleges American Eagle entered inaccurate data in the EWBS, then operated the aircraft with incorrect weight and balance information. The proposed civil penalty is $80,000.
The FAA also alleges American Eagle used improper procedures to repair an engine on one of its Embraer 135 regional jets, and that a mechanic signed off as “complete” on work he had not performed. As a result, American Eagle operated the aircraft on 34 flights between Sept.11 and Sept. 17, 2010, when it was not in compliance with regulations. The proposed civil penalty is $75,000.
American Eagle has 30 days from the receipt of the FAA’s enforcement letters to respond to the agency.
Tuesday, August 09, 2011
Riding the W seats
Pilot Security Screening. Recall, the NYTimes recently report that there are still 27 unaccounted for pilots with aviation credentials who are on the terrorist watchlist.
Commuters.
Right this Way.
In Perspective, from Schneier.
Saturday, August 06, 2011
Friday, August 05, 2011
Aviation & GAO
Aviation Security: TSA Has Enhanced Its Explosives Detection Requirements for Checked Baggage, but Additional Screening Actions Are Needed, GAO-11-740, July 11 (64 pages.
Highlights.
Aviation Security: TSA Has Taken Actions to Improve Security, but Additional Efforts Remain, GAO-11-807T, July 13 (20 pages).
Highlights.
Update from SpaceWeather
Space Weather News for August 4, 2011
http://spaceweather.com
SOLAR ACTIVITY: For the third day in a row, sunspot 1261 has unleashed a significant M-class solar flare. The latest blast at 0357 UT on August 4th registered M9.3 on the Richter Scale of Flares, almost crossing the threshold into X-territory (X-flares are the most powerful kind). Also, at least two coronal mass ejections are en route to Earth, and they could provoke mild to moderate geomagnetic storms when they arrive on August 4th through 6th. High-latitude sky watchers should be alert for auroras. Check Spaceweather. for details and updates.
DON'T MISS THE STORM: Would you like a call when geomagnetic storms are in progress? Space weather alerts are available from
SpaceWeatherText.
(text)
and
SpaceWeatherPhone.(voice).
Thursday, August 04, 2011
United Fined
DOT 99-11
Thursday, August 4, 2011
Contact: Bill Mosley
Tel.: (202) 366-4570
DOT Fines United Airlines for Providing Inaccurate Information About Baggage Liability
The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) today fined United Airlines $20,000 for providing inaccurate information to passengers about how much compensation they could potentially receive for lost, damaged or delayed baggage on international flights.
“Both domestic and international travelers have a right to know how much they might be compensated for lost or delayed baggage,” U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said. “We are committed to protecting airline consumers, and we will continue to take enforcement action when necessary.”
Under the Montreal Convention, an international agreement that sets liability limits for international air transportation, airlines are liable for damages caused by lost, damaged or delayed baggage up to a 1,131 Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) per passenger, an amount that is currently the equivalent of just over $1,800 in U.S. currency. In November 2009, the Department’s Aviation Enforcement Office notified U.S. and foreign carriers that the international liability limit would be increased from 1,000 SDRs to the new limit effective Dec. 30, 2009, and advised them to revise their notices to passengers to reflect the change.
In January 2011, the Department’s Aviation Enforcement Office learned that United had given a number of passengers ticket wallets printed after the increase took effect that continued to list the old figure of 1,000 SDRs as the limit on baggage liability. However, the Enforcement Office found no evidence that United had used the old liability limit when handling baggage-related claims after the increase went into effect.
The consent order is available on the Internet at Regulations.
Use docket # DOT-OST-2011-0003.
Air Canada Fined
DOT 100-11
Thursday, August 4, 2011
Contact: Bill Mosley
Tel.: (202) 366-4570
DOT Fines Air Canada for Violating Price Advertising Rules
The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) today fined Air Canada $50,000 for violating the Department’s rules prohibiting deceptive price advertising in air travel.
“When passengers buy an airline ticket, they have a right to know how much they will have to pay,” said U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. “We take our airline price advertising rules seriously and will take enforcement action when they are violated.”
The Department’s Aviation Enforcement Office found that Air Canada, for a period of time in early 2011, displayed advertisements on its websites that did not disclose the amount of taxes and fees that passengers would have to pay in addition to the advertised fare or lead the consumer directly to the information on these taxes and fees. Consumers clicking on the ads were taken to a page on Air Canada’s website where a list of routes and prices were displayed, but consumers could not find details of the additional taxes and fees unless they scrolled to the bottom of the page where the information was shown in fine print.
Air Canada’s advertisements violated DOT rules requiring any advertising that includes a price for air transportation to state the full price to be paid by the consumer, including all carrier-imposed surcharges. The only exception currently allowed is government-imposed taxes and fees that are assessed on a per-passenger basis, such as passenger facility charges, which may be stated separately from the advertised fare but must be clearly disclosed in the advertisement so that passengers can easily determine the full price they must pay. These rules apply to both U.S. and foreign carriers.
Under DOT’s recently adopted consumer rule that enhances protections for air travelers, carriers will be required, among other things, to include all government taxes and fees in advertised fares beginning Jan. 24, 2012.
The consent order it available on the Internet at
Regualtions.
Use docket # DOT-OST-2011-0003.
Tuesday, August 02, 2011
Press Conferencing
U.S. Department of Transportation
Tuesday, August 02, 2011
USDOT Contact: Public Affairs
Tel.: (202) 366-4570
MEDIA ADVISORY
U.S. TRANSPORTATION SECRETARY RAY LAHOOD
AND FAA ADMINISTRATOR RANDY BABBITT HOLD PRESS CONFERENCE CALL ON NEED FOR AN FAA BILL EXTENSION
WASHINGTON – U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood and FAA Administrator Randy Babbitt will hold a press conference call at 2:30 PM ET, TODAY, Tuesday, August 2, 2011 on the need for Congress to pass an extension of the FAA’s reauthorization. Since July 22, airports around the country have lost $2.5 billion in federal dollars for important airport projects, 70,000 construction workers and workers in related fields have been laid off, and approximately 4,000 FAA employees have been on furlough.
Yesterday, the House recessed and Members flew home for vacation without resolving issues keeping the FAA extension from passing. If no action is taken before the House returns from vacation on September 7, nearly 75,000 people will go without work for another 5 weeks and the FAA will lose approximately $1 billion in revenues.
WHAT: Press Conference on Need for FAA Bill Extension
WHEN: Tuesday, August 02, 2011
2:30pm ET
WHO: U.S. Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood
FAA Administrator Randy Babbitt
WHERE: Dial in: (800) 230-1093
Note: Tell the operator you are joining the DOT Press Briefing
